W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2008

Re: alt - data and reason Re: One more thought...

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 09:55:45 +0200
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ubf0a7tcwxe0ny@249.116.205.85.in-addr.arpa>

On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:27:11 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
wrote:

> On May 19, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

>> Actually, we don't even have any decent qualitative data on this - and  
>> it is the crucial point in the entire debate. Since it really does  
>> hinge on *motive*, I think the best way to proceed on this question is  
>> to get some information from a group of tool developers, who can  
>> explain whether they do or don't abuse alt="" or leave out alt based on  
>> validity reqirements, thoughts about ugly tooltips, believing that  
>> there is nothing appropriate that could be said, or some other basis.
>
> I hope this goes without saying but asking anyone whether they are  
> "abusing" something is unlikely to get forthright answers.

Indeed :)

Cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals   Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 07:56:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:17 GMT