- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:14:29 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>
- Cc: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Sam Kuper wrote: > On 01/03/2008, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > > Yes, I agree that it doesn't address Olaf's objections. I'm just > > saying that we <p> is already neutrally defined. > > On my current understanding of Olaf's ontology, the term "paragraph" > isn't neutral: it applies only to one side of the prose/poetry > distinction. Therefore, <p> is not neutrally defined insofar as it is > stated to represent a paragraph. It's not stated to represent a paragraph, it's stated to represent a http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#paragraph, which is defined to represent, amongst other things, a stanza in a poem. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2008 07:14:45 UTC