Le 30 juin 2008 à 06:20, Ian Hickson a écrit : > On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: >> I believe many developers rely on the RFC definitions. > > I would be surprised if this were so, but I have no data to back my > position. Not reliable but can give hints on the frequency. 113 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+3986%22 25 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+3987%22 157 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+2732%22 318 942 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=url 139 989 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=uri 529 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=iri 25 011 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=rfc 605 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+2822%22 1 860 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+822%22 -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be CoolReceived on Monday, 30 June 2008 02:31:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:36 GMT