W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2008

Re: expected results for URI encoding tests?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:50:25 -0500
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1214513425.11021.380.camel@pav.lan>

On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 19:45 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > 
> > Ian, these test materials look pretty handy...
> >   http://hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/uri/encoding/
> 
> They aren't really tests, more what I call demos -- files that were 
> intended to show behaviour for reverse engineering, not files intended to 
> show pass or fail conditions.

Well, I'm interested to turn them into tests... or at least
motivate collection of some reverse engineering data for us all
to mull over.

> > but I'm not 100% confident I understand how they work.
> > What's the expected result from 002.html , for example?
> 
> There's no expected result for any of them really, at least not when they 
> were written. Do you mean expected results with respect to HTML4, HTML5, 
> URI, IRI, HTTP, ...?

HTML 5.

My impression is that you took the demos, ran them against several
implementations and then figured out a design to write up.

Maybe I'm just being lazy and I should read the draft more carefully,
but I did try. Actually, I suppose it would be better if
somebody besides Ian could answer my question(s) based on the text
that Ian has written.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 20:49:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:55 UTC