W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2008

RE: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please?

From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:05:30 -0400
To: "'Steven Faulkner'" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "'Gregory J. Rosmaita'" <oedipus@hicom.net>
Cc: <connolly@w3.org>, <chris.wilson@microsoft.com>, <mike@w3.org>, <alfred.s.gilman@ieee.org>, <brewer@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>, <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, <www-archive@w3.org>, <wai-liaison@w3.org>
Message-ID: <014f01c8cfba$098c3770$1ca4a650$@com>

> the answer  appears in the IRC logs
> 
>  [18:56] <DanC> MikeSmith, do you know why there are just 5 people in
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/ there were a dozen or so as of
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2008Apr/00
00.html
> [18:56] <MikeSmith> because of issues 42-50
>
> source: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080613#l-359

Stephen -

That does not adequately explain the situation at all. Could someone please
illuminate this group as to what "because of issues 42 - 50" is supposed to
mean? I am seeing more and more things over the last few weeks that make
this group feel more and more like a "show trial" and I would much rather
know that this is not so.

J.Ja
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 14:06:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:55 UTC