Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics

Justin James wrote:
> Robert -
> 
> I think I "get" it now. There are two items which are throwing me for a
> loop; the word "legend", and the way I *thought* you were using the concept
> of semantics.
> 
> OK, here is my revised understanding:
> 
> "Legend" tries to provide a mechanism so that the semantic value of a tag
> can be derived from the CSS definitions applied to the tag (with the usual
> hierarchies, inheritance, etc.). It is similar in *concept* to "aria-role",
> but instead of defining a function role at the element level, it specifies a
> semantic purpose at the CSS definition level.

I hate to interrupt, but isn't this more productively taken to the CSS 
WG?  Bringing up a change to CSS as an issue here when there is no 
actual action this WG can take on it seems counterproductive.

A