- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:54:19 +1000
- To: public-html@w3.org
Currently the spec says: If any of the elements in the serialization are in the null namespace, the default namespace in scope for those elements must be explicitly declared as the empty string. — http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/#innerhtml1 Is there any reason for this? Why not allow elements to be in no namespace by virtue of there being no xmlns="" attribute in ancestor-or-self::*? Also, there are a few mentions of elements/attributes being “in the null namespace”, which strictly should be “in no namespace”. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Sunday, 1 June 2008 04:59:11 UTC