W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Clarify what it means for the system identifier to be missing

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:20:45 +0100
To: "Geoffrey Sneddon" <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Cc: "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t67e0lpx64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:58:02 +0100, Geoffrey Sneddon  
<foolistbar@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2008, at 21:51, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure I remember the tokenizer making a difference between  
>> the empty string and it being absent. Are you sure?
>
> I don't see anything (looking even closer than before) about it.

From

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section-tokenisation.html

"When a DOCTYPE token is created, its name, public identifier, and system  
identifier must be marked as missing, ..."

"Set the DOCTYPE token's system identifier to the empty string, ..."


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:15:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:53 UTC