Re: Clarify what it means for the system identifier to be missing

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:31:27 +0100, Geoffrey Sneddon  
<foolistbar@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Currently in section 8.2.4.1 The initial phase it speaks of when the  
> system identifier is missing, even though from the parser there will  
> always be a system identifier, even if it has a zero length. It should  
> be spoken of as being empty (i.e., zero length) and not missing.

I'm pretty sure I remember the tokenizer making a difference between the  
empty string and it being absent. Are you sure?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>