On 21/02/2008, Marghanita da Cruz <marghanita@ramin.com.au> wrote: > > It could be non-conforming, for the valid reasons put forward, but we > could > discuss how it should degrade. Or better still: it could be conforming, for the valid reasons put forward (and because it always has been until now), and then we wouldn't have to discuss how it would degrade. SamReceived on Friday, 22 February 2008 00:08:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:09 GMT