W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2008

Re: ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): Need to define processing requirements for aria states and properties when used in html [HTML 5 spec]

From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:03:37 +0000
Message-ID: <47BDBCF9.7010507@cam.ac.uk>
To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
CC: HTML Issue Tracking WG <public-html@w3.org>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>

Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:
> this "issue" represents a fundamental mis-understanding of the point of
> ARIA markup and the PFWG's attempts to work with the HTML WG 

[...]

> i vote that this is a NON-ISSUE as, but would support re-opening it
> WITHOUT the following verbiage:
> 
> <q 
> cite="http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/35">
> It also requires consideration of how aria 
> features interact with html-native features and, where 
> functionality is duplicated, consideration of whether the 
> advantages of having more than one way to achieve the same 
> effect outweighs the cost.
> </q>

I think I'm misunderstanding something. If we don't specify the interaction 
between aria-* and HTML then how will we get interoperable behavior? For example 
how will UAs handle markup like:

<label for="a">Foo</label><span id="b">Bar</span><input id="a" aria-labelledby="b">

or

<tr><th id="a" scope="row">Foo</th>
<tr><td aria-describedby="a">



-- 
"Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?"
  -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:03:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:52 UTC