W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation?

From: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:12:29 +1000
Message-ID: <5f37426b0802190212i388750dex38c3e6c19749066d@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Karl Groves" <karl.groves@ssbbartgroup.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Link might help: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SpecReviews

On Feb 19, 2008 8:11 PM, Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com> wrote:
> You may also find it useful to update the "spec reviews" wiki page
> with links to your posts in the archives. Jump in!
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2008 2:16 AM, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Karl,
> >
> > Le 18 févr. 2008 à 15:45, Karl Groves a écrit :
> > > I was wondering if there was an established protocol for submitting
> > > reviews of the HTML5 recommendation?  Should they be posted to this
> > > address? Should it be within the body of the e-mail or as an
> > > attachment? If as an attachment, what file formats are preferred?
> >
> > In the Status of the document, right now it is said:
> >
> >      If you wish to make comments regarding this
> >      document, please send them to public-html-comments@w3.org
> >      (subscribe, archives). All feedback is welcome.
> >      -- HTML 5
> >      http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
> >      Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:13 GMT
> >
> > Each person have their own habits. But I would recommend each time you
> > make a comment
> >
> > 1. to create a separate mail for each technical issue with an
> > appropriate topic on the Subject line
> > 2. give the link to the appropriate section with the reference with
> > the dated uri of the spec.
> >     Ex: table caption element
> >     http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/#the-caption
> > 3. To talk about the issue in clear terms
> > 4. To submit test cases with your issue if you want to illustrate an
> > implementation flaw
> >
> > (group all typos, grammar, etc. in one email)
> >
> > Some personal recommendations
> > * Be patient for the answer it might take a long while.
> > * Keep a record of the issues URIs you sent to the list
> >    Ex: Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation?
> >    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Feb/0289
> > * Try always to be constructive, aka propose something more than
> > pointing out a flaw.
> > * Be aware they are people with many different cultures, goals, and
> > background on this list. And it might require time to understand and
> > explain things.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hope it helps.
> >
> > --
> > Karl Dubost - W3C
> > http://www.w3.org/QA/
> > Be Strict To Be Cool
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 10:12:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:52 UTC