- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:08:40 +0000
- To: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
- CC: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
If I cannot convince you that <strike> is purely presentational (and therefore semantic-free), just as are <b>, <u>, <i> and so on), whilst <strike> (cf. <strong>, <heading>, <em>) are purely semantic and carry no presentational overtones, then I am afraid we will have to differ. Philip TAYLOR -------- Lee Kowalkowski wrote: > On 08/02/2008, Philip TAYLOR > <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org> wrote: >> No, it means "struck through". > > Struck through means deleted! Seriouly, if theres another meaning, > one shouldn't use the strike element. If in another world, text with > a line through it meant it was a heading, one should use a heading > element and style accordingly. We are making too many allowances for > presentational use cases. >
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 12:08:46 UTC