W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:45:02 -0500
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <40144D23-3DB6-40CC-A275-08DB65288525@la-grange.net>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>


Le 24 déc. 2008 à 05:43, Ian Hickson a écrit :
>> 0.0196	Bad value (consolidated) for attribute “width” on element  
>> “img”: Bad
>> positive integer: Zero is not a positive integer.
>> 0.0154	Bad value (consolidated) for attribute “height” on element  
>> “img”: Bad
>> positive integer: Zero is not a positive integer.
>> 0.0139	Bad value (consolidated) for attribute “height” on element  
>> “iframe”:
>> Bad positive integer: Zero is not a positive integer.
>> 0.0133	Bad value (consolidated) for attribute “width” on element  
>> “iframe”:
>> Bad positive integer: Zero is not a positive integer.
>
> Zero? Really? That seems like an out-and-out error.


I suspect an image used for tracking but with the desire to not be  
displayed.


-- 
Karl
Received on Wednesday, 24 December 2008 12:45:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:27 GMT