On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > > Right; the idea is to reduce the number of headers that are used here, > > by having a higher barrier to entry than just registration. (It's a > > bit like "RFC required" from RFC5226.) > > That barrier is not particularly high, unless you require > standards-track RFCs. It is significantly higher psychologically than the registration mechanism. > I really don't see the point defining something else than the IETF does > for this purpose. The idea is to discourage the use of this mechanism. This is a different goal than the IETF's registration mechanism's. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 23 December 2008 19:52:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:25 GMT