Hi, feedback on "Define how to register new http-equiv values. (credit: ma) (whatwg r2548)": <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#other-pragma-directives>: "...Such extensions must use a name that is identical to a previously-registered HTTP header defined in an RFC, and must have behavior identical to that described for the HTTP header...." HTTP headers do not need to be defined in RFCs, there's a registry for it. See <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4229>, <http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/prov-headers.html>, and <http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html>. BR, JulianReceived on Saturday, 20 December 2008 10:09:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:46 GMT