W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2008


From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:08:21 +0100
Message-ID: <494CC415.6010903@gmx.de>
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>


feedback on "Define how to register new http-equiv values. (credit: ma) 
(whatwg r2548)":


"...Such extensions must use a name that is identical to a 
previously-registered HTTP header defined in an RFC, and must have 
behavior identical to that described for the HTTP header...."

HTTP headers do not need to be defined in RFCs, there's a registry for 
it. See <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4229>, 
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/prov-headers.html>, and 

BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 20 December 2008 10:09:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:40 UTC