Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs

Henri Sivonen wrote:

> Those had the http or https URI scheme (a promiscuous 
> self-signing-accepting certificate handler was used for https), returned 
> text/html as Content-Type and 200 as the response status.
> 
> So yes, this set did contain pseudo-XHTML. But note that HTML5 makes the 
> most common pseudo-XHTML talismans conforming and tree builder-level 
> doctype errors didn't count.

Thanks, Henri : would it be possible (i.e., easy)
to partition the statistics on the basis of DOCTYPE ?

Philip TAYLOR