W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs

From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:31:20 +0100
Message-ID: <48B90558.5010004@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>



Henri Sivonen wrote:

> Those had the http or https URI scheme (a promiscuous 
> self-signing-accepting certificate handler was used for https), returned 
> text/html as Content-Type and 200 as the response status.
> 
> So yes, this set did contain pseudo-XHTML. But note that HTML5 makes the 
> most common pseudo-XHTML talismans conforming and tree builder-level 
> doctype errors didn't count.

Thanks, Henri : would it be possible (i.e., easy)
to partition the statistics on the basis of DOCTYPE ?

Philip TAYLOR
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2008 08:32:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:22 GMT