Le 29 août 08 à 12:13, Simon Pieters a écrit : > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:04:33 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > >> Yeah, I don't love the name either. I'm open to ideas, but the >> problem is >> any descriptive name becomes quite unwieldy and unlike other names. > > <action>? Reading the spec <bb> seems to be "browser button" for invoking an action in the browser. <action> seems too far from the browser and don't introduce the concept of button. For me, an <action> is something that can happen, not something that I can trigger. Because this is a button I think the element name must have "button". What about : - <bbutton> (for browser button) - <ubutton> (for utility button) - <abutton> (for action button) I don't find it neat, but maybe it can help to find a more speaking name. -- Nicolas LE GALL http://blog.neovov.com FOAF : http://blog.neovov.com/foaf.rdfReceived on Friday, 29 August 2008 10:37:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:40 GMT