W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>

From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:18:48 +0200
Message-ID: <48B313A8.7090009@malform.no>
To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
CC: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>, Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>

Philip TAYLOR 2008-08-25 22.08:

> Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

>> [...] the draft says [...]


> Yes, but the point I (and others) keep trying to make
> is that this is what <stress>the editor's draft</>

 > says : it is up to this WG to discuss this,

If I believed otherwise, I would have said 'specification' and not 
'draft'.

> If, every time someone
> points out that some aspect of the current design is
> unsatisfactory, the reaction is "but that's
> what the draft says", then we may as well all shut
> up and go home.


Agree. I just wanted to point out that <video> doesn't support 
fallback - so we react to the fact and not to what we think is the 
fact.

>  The whole point of this WG is
> to /challenge/ the draft, whenever/wherever it
> appears less than ideal : only by so doing will
> we (a) remit our brief, as WG members, and (b) have
> any hope that the final version of the specification
> will will represent the best possible thinking at
> this time.

Subscribed!
===========
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 20:19:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:57 UTC