Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>

Dave Singer wrote:
>> That seems entirely unreasonable to me.  In particular, it doesn't let 
>> me, as an author, try for a higher-quality codec with fallback to a 
>> more commonly supported one.
> 
> No, you mis-understand.  That case is precisely why multiple source 
> elements are allowed.

Hmm.  OK.  So I can fall back to a different codec using multiple 
<source>s.  I can't fall back to a video format that only has plug-in 
support, though?

-Boris