Henri Sivonen wrote: >> So if the UA doesn't support the particular codec but does support >> <video> it should not show the fallback content? > > That's what the spec says, yes. That seems entirely unreasonable to me. In particular, it doesn't let me, as an author, try for a higher-quality codec with fallback to a more commonly supported one. -BorisReceived on Monday, 25 August 2008 18:35:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:19 GMT