Re: Interactiveness of <details>

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> 
> Substantive:
> Banning interactive descendants of <details> seems excessive. I suggest
> confining the descendant ban only to the descendants of the <legend> child of
> <details>.
> 
> Editorial:
> The context and content model for <details> fails to mention the
> interactiveness exclusions in the way the context and content model for <a>
> mentions them.

This got fixed recently. Are the current definitions for interactiveness 
satisfactory?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 07:16:08 UTC