On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008, at 16:45, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > > Or should "transparent" be read to imply that <style scoped> isn't allowed > > there? (If that's the case, there are <ins>/<del> repercussions, too. Sigh.) > > It might be sensible not to define <style scoped> as being itself prose > content. This would mean that <style scoped> (like individual list items > or table cells) couldn't be marked up as inserted/deleted which would > reduce the complexity of ins/del. I hesitate to do this because I don't want people to end up just wrapping <style> elements in <div>s or <span>s to sneak them into <ins> or <del>. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 23:31:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:40 GMT