Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal

Hi Karl,

> I have been clear and precise in my initial message *entirely left to WCAG*.
> The second draft proposal is doing the same mistake than the current text. I
> said it here:
>
>>> The specification would then be lighter, could have a pointer saying all
>>> the
>>> requirements for accessibility are defined in wcag 2.0.

Makes sense.

> My proposal is something along:
>
>        All img elements must have the alt content attribute set.
>        The accessibility requirements on the possible values of
>        the alt attributes are defined by WCAG 2.0 and not HTML 5.

Perfect.

Thank you!

Best Regards,
Laura

-- 
Laura L. Carlson