W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: alt attribute - a very simple proposal

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:42:28 -0500
Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0808190542h37bec5b5pfe071d3a050eed83@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>

Hi Karl,

> I have been clear and precise in my initial message *entirely left to WCAG*.
> The second draft proposal is doing the same mistake than the current text. I
> said it here:
>
>>> The specification would then be lighter, could have a pointer saying all
>>> the
>>> requirements for accessibility are defined in wcag 2.0.

Makes sense.

> My proposal is something along:
>
>        All img elements must have the alt content attribute set.
>        The accessibility requirements on the possible values of
>        the alt attributes are defined by WCAG 2.0 and not HTML 5.

Perfect.

Thank you!

Best Regards,
Laura

-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 12:43:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:22 GMT