Re: Flickr and alt

David Poehlman wrote:
> Anyone who chooses can break the law and suffer the consequences.

That's not a freedom.  That's a threat of violence on your part against 
said lawbreakers (pretty much by definition of lawbreaking).

> No one would be prohiitted from publishing, they would just not be conformant.

This brings us back to the question of what the point of conformance is, 
of course.  If being conformant is too much pain, no one will be, and 
then what's the poing?

-Boris