W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: What namespace features popular SVG tools really emit (ISSUE-37)

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:35:34 +0100
Message-ID: <48A7FEF6.3010207@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:

> 
> So out of the whole set of documents, 0.36% weren't XMLNS-wellformed and 
> even less failed to parse in an non-NS-aware parser?
> 
> That's a really small fraction, given the fact that I keep hearing "XML 
> has failed on the web" and "people do not understand namespaces".

I think that that argument is actually true of (purported) XHMTL, but 
fails to acknowledge that both hand authors of SVG and SVG authoring 
tool writers are more technically aware.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Sunday, 17 August 2008 10:34:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:22 GMT