On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > > My intent is to defer to the relevant standards and let them decide > > what's valid or not. I don't think we should micromanage this, since > > it changes so much. (Right now HTML5 refers to RFC3066, but I'll > > update the reference appropriately to the moving-target reference > > rather than a specific RFC before we're done.) > > If you want to refer to a specific version, refer to what's current now. > If you want to refer to "the latest and greatest", refer to BCP 47. Right, that's what I meant by the moving-target reference. A bunch of people have already suggested this: http://www.whatwg.org/issues/#references -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 22:55:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:38 GMT