Re: Extensibility strategies, was: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)

On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote on 08/06/2008 04:01:27 PM:
> > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > > Suffice it to say that I now see some potential promise for the 
> > > proposal that you have outlined. I'm not yet convinced that it is 
> > > usable enough for people to actually consider trying it, but if it 
> > > does end up getting documented and used (which may involve tweaking 
> > > the proposal), I can see it as the basis for closing issue 41..
> >
> > Ok... What changes would the spec need to get us there?
> 
> As to your question: I'm not sure yet.

Ok. Please do let me know when you are. I can't really address your use 
case if I don't know in what way the spec doesn't address your use case.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 00:21:31 UTC