Justin James wrote: > I agree, it would be much more consistent for a javascript: protocol item in > the src to be executed as JavaScript. In fact, I would content that: > > <img src="javascript:..." /> > > should be allowed So do a number of other people. And the current HTML5 draft allows it. So I'm not sure what the problem is, exactly. -BorisReceived on Monday, 11 August 2008 18:01:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:19 GMT