- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:15:42 +0200
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Chris Wilson wrote: > Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] wrote: >> The "obvious lack of belief" you mention is more like "obvious >> resignation to the fact that IE isn't planning to support XHTML any time >> soon, so it's not usable in practice unless you're willing to require a >> non-IE browser" >> >> That is, it's simply part of your "realities of deploying XHTML, given >> that it is not supported in current versions of IE". There is no >> separate reality here involving other browser implementors, where your >> message implies there is one. > ... >> I'm not sure what gave you this idea. From what I can tell, said "other >> browsers" are committed to supporting an XML serialization of HTML and >> to fixing bugs in said support. What else were you looking for in terms >> of "interest"? > > Other browser vendors and content people seem much more interested in kicking us about other deficiencies than our lack of XHTML. I consider myself a "content person", and the lack of XHTML support in IE certainly is one of biggest issues I have with IE. BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 06:16:25 UTC