Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)

• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:02:39 +0200
• To: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
• CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <48934FBF.3040607@gmx.de>

Edward O'Connor wrote:
>>> You can add RDF trackback in html comments. So that the file continue to
>>> validate.  In this case the vocabulary has been hidden because html could
>>> not be extended without keeping validity.
>> Yet another example where people resorted to hacks in order to work around
>> the missing extensibility model.
> 
> Well, yet another example where people unnecessarily ignored HTML's
> existing extensibility points--pingback being the obvious
> counter-example.

Could you clarify what extension points you're talking about? Class?

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 18:03:25 UTC