Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)

Karl Dubost wrote:
>> It would appear the extent of adoption is pretty much limited to 
>> Microsoft
>> Office's HTML output so far. This is actually pretty strong evidence that
>> the ability to unilaterally introduce and use proprietary vocabularies is
>> not a widely needed feature.
> 
> You can add RDF trackback in html comments. So that the file continue to 
> validate.  In this case the vocabulary has been hidden because html 
> could not be extended without keeping validity.

Yet another example where people resorted to hacks in order to work 
around the missing extensibility model.

Best regards, Julian