W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:43:54 +0200
Message-ID: <48934B5A.5080202@gmx.de>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>

Karl Dubost wrote:
>> It would appear the extent of adoption is pretty much limited to 
>> Microsoft
>> Office's HTML output so far. This is actually pretty strong evidence that
>> the ability to unilaterally introduce and use proprietary vocabularies is
>> not a widely needed feature.
> You can add RDF trackback in html comments. So that the file continue to 
> validate.  In this case the vocabulary has been hidden because html 
> could not be extended without keeping validity.

Yet another example where people resorted to hacks in order to work 
around the missing extensibility model.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 17:44:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:36 UTC