W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:19:51 -0400
To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: James <j_james@mindspring.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, public-html-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFAA1B5A9A.26D6546B-ON85257498.00439A72-85257498.0043BC45@us.ibm.com>
Laura Carlson wrote on 08/01/2008 07:31:02 AM:
>
> Hi Sam and Justin,
>
> Sam wrote:
>
> > My opinion is that there one change that would make this process
stronger
> > is if there were a clear escallation path for cases such as these.
>
> Justin wrote:
>
> > I joined this group in the hopes of having the chance to reverse the
course
> > of HTML 5, which when I read the initial public draft, I was absolutely
> > appalled by.
>
> I would encourage you both to bring your concerns to a Teleconference
> [1] and try to get a Tracker issue [2] RAISED, OPENED and maybe an
> ACTION assigned to move it to the PENDINGREVIEW stage where you can
> suggest "a consensus action that requires WG and/or chair review; this
> may prompt the WG chairs to estimate the level of consensus and put a
> question to the WG in order to resolve the issue." [3]

This is the issue: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41

> Best Regards,
> Laura
>
> [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Teleconferences
> [2]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML#head-b1c997dd7648a369f4639d079c027d819abbecc4
> [3] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML#line-14
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson

- Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 14:07:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:21 GMT