W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2007

Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5

From: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:20:04 +1300
To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
Cc: Adam Nash <adamn@wirespring.com>, public-html@w3.org
Message-id: <46FF15E4.8080407@55.co.nz>

Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Dean, I would like to hear if I interpreted your repeated claims about logical, semantic, simple etc correctly. Or could you, finally, explain what the logic-ness, semantic-ness and simple-ness about your proposal is?
> [... 'HTML 5 text' and 'HTML 5 xml' ... ]
It's pretty obvious isn't it?
> 'HTML 5 xml' ... ]
Why is this -> 'HTML 5 xml'
better than this -> XHTML5

Why should I have to explain the following:
Why don't you explain how your idea is:
I'm getting tired of debating something that is so simple and so obvious 
to most. It's already in the spec, go read it.

Dean Edridge
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2007 03:20:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:27 UTC