Hi Henri, On Sep 17, 2007, at 4:36 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > <video> accessibility was discussed on IRC today. Here are some > issues that I think the spec should address. > > The spec already says that the fallback is [] for old browsers. I > think it should drive the point even more explicitly and say it > isn't for accessibility alternatives in <video>-aware UAs and that > accessibility should be handled in the video itself. While I think there are many opportunities to add accessibility to formats from other specifications, I think we should focus our attention on HTML5. I propose we save the accessibility hit jobs for HTML6 after we've already verified that other technologies can replace what HTML already offers. If we could stop this accessibility flame-bait I think the WG could make a lot more progress much more quickly than we currently are. Take care, RobReceived on Monday, 17 September 2007 13:20:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:01 GMT