- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:29:07 +0100
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> This would be a real problem if our task was to write errata for HTML4. >> Fortunately it is not. Therefore we can concentrate on the rather more >> interesting task of working out what the HTML 5 spec ought to say in order >> that it is as useful as possible. > > It is not interesting if we are ignoring what we have, and set forth as if we had just arrived at terra nullus. We can cannibalize HTML 4 for ideas even without absolute agreement on how it is supposed to be interpreted. -- "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2007 17:29:21 UTC