W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2007

Re: testing versus expert opinion

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:20:38 +0100
Message-ID: <46E641C6.9060201@splintered.co.uk>
To: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>

Steve Faulkner wrote:

> <anne> also funny: 
> http://html4all.org/pipermail/list_html4all.org/2007-September/000267.html
> <mjs_> yes, actual testing counts for more than the opinion of an 
> official expert  
> <mjs> the shocking secret is out
>  
> cite:http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20070911

Strangely, it's not a case of "EITHER expert OR testing"...it's a false 
dichotomy. Experts can help devise tests to include known problematic 
situations, to ensure that the tests are realistic and conclusive.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 07:20:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:49 UTC