W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2007

Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:37:06 +0900
Message-Id: <32874078-BD54-4388-8DD3-3CA5F950711C@w3.org>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>

Jens Meiert (10 sept. 2007 - 20:16) :
>> "banner",  "masthead" and "note".
> It also doesn't solve the problem that these names imply a certain  
> kind of presentation,

I didn't imply any layout for all of them above, just their meaning  
(if you have followed the link to wikipedia.)

> and beside the general problem with that, does it really work  
> everywhere?

What would you propose for each of them.

# Element name
   * Use Case
   * Definition
   * Test Cases

>> I guess the proposed names come from the class names found on the
>> Web.
> I don't really consider this to be a good argument.

I didn't say it was. :) I just explained the why of the name.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 11:37:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:26 UTC