On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:11:34 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > We really should answer the question we asked before: why would it be > conforming to include those characters in the first place? I can see a good reason to prohibit U+0000 (and that's done), but what is the reason for making these other characters non-conforming? They are not posing any interoperability problem and are also supported by the DOM. I'm not sure why we should limit the HTML serialization here. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Sunday, 9 September 2007 15:57:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:00 GMT