Re: [html] Semantics of "aside", "header", and "footer"

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:11:28 +0100 Message-ID: <46E034C0.20304@Rhul.Ac.Uk> To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com> CC: public-html@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:15 GMT

Jens Meiert wrote:

> (Apologies for recent WG discussion and collaboration absence; I moved.)
> 
> I need to bring up the "aside" [1], "header" [2], and "footer" [3] elements again, no matter that they've been discussed a few times yet. I'm still not convinced that their names are very appropriate as they seem to be too "presentational" and almost meaningless.
> 
> I'm very interested in how you judge that and whether more WG members see those as an issue, and beside asking for your pick, I may illustrate the problem by at the same time proposing alternate names and slightly different/complementary semantics like:

Totally unconvinced that we need any of them.
Philip TAYLOR