Steve Faulkner wrote: > Once the arguments for omitting the alt attribute have been thoroughly > reseached. If it turns out that there are legitimate cases for > indicating that no alt has been provided, what would the arguments be > against using alt=" " (quote space quote) to signify an image that for > which an alt has been provided? > > This would differentiate it from cases where the author has not provided > an alt attribute/text on images that are not "critical content" out of > ignorance or laziness. Distinguishing the cases alt="" and alt=" " would make it very easy to typo a meaningfully-different value and very hard to spot the mistake. If such an explicit indicator is desirable, using alt="" and noalt seems like a better solution. -- "Mixed up signals Bullet train People snuffed out in the brutal rain" --Conner OberstReceived on Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:59:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:00 GMT