W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2007

Re: @title's relation to accessibility

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:13:34 +0100
Message-ID: <46DD680E.3090602@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: public-html@w3.org
CC: wai-xtech@w3.org



Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
> At 14:19 -0500 UTC, on 2007-09-03, Jon Barnett wrote:

>> Remember that "accessibility" doesn't just mean "readable to blind people".
> 
> Within the W3C space, it does. I dislike it, but I think we need to be
> realistic about it.

Does it ?  I understood it meant "accessible to people who
do not have the ability to respond to all sensory stimuli
in the same way as is generally accepted as 'normal'".

I've never seen this definition, but from earlier discussions
this was the meaning I gleaned.

Philip Taylor
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:15:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:07 GMT