On 04/09/07, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote: > > Remember that "accessibility" doesn't just mean "readable to blind people". > > Within the W3C space, it does. I dislike it, but I think we need to be > realistic about it. Untrue. 9 years ago I was corrected, by a W3C employee, when I made that assumption. Quite strongly IIRC. [... ]<del>accessibility</del><ins>universality</ins>. > > To be honest, I don't even see the universality aspect of @title. Making use > of an element or attribute to specify its meaning is 'just' about semantics > isn't it? How about semantics that are helpfully leveraged for many users? My liking is that I can tell if it's a PDF at the end of the link, or a site that needs log-in. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.ukReceived on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 06:57:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:00 GMT