W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2007

Re: keep conformance objective (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)

From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:20:14 +0100
Message-ID: <46D920BE.3070306@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org

Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:

 > This makes it impossible to require semantic elements to be used for
 > their semantics. This would allow me to do something like <h1>This is
 > nice large text, which isn't a header</h1> in a conformant HTML 5
 > document. We need to require things like this, even if it is impossible
 > to check these electronically.

This can qualify only as a "should".  If it can't be checked
programatically, it can't be a "must".

Received on Saturday, 1 September 2007 08:20:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:26 UTC