On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Julian Reschke wrote: > > - If the HTML WG thinks that the name is not important, then, it seems, > the right way to address this is to stop using it and make the XHTML WG > happy. We covered this option in the e-mail to which you replied: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Oct/0386.html > - But as far as I recall, the much more interesting question is what > namespace to use, right? The namespace is a separate issue, but actually it's a very simple issue. We have no choice whatsoever on what namespace to use -- in order to continue being compatible with legacy content and legacy user agents, we are forced to use "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml". (That's unfortunate, because having a year in a namespace is IMHO poor design, but oh well.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:51:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:05 GMT