- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:47:54 -0500
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 21:55 +0100, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: [...various things...] I don't see any suggested text in that message. Let's please focus on suggestions to the editor. Supporting rationale is good, but not to the exclusion of suggested text. Are you arguing in support of the suggestion you made 26 Sep 2007 16:11:06 -0400? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Sep/0519.html I'm still interested to hear from the editor about that suggestion. Henri said he didn't find it appealing, and he has offered two suggestions (21 Oct 2007 18:01:54 +0300). I'm not repeating them here because I get the impression he doesn't consider them an improvement on the current text (http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.html 1.10, which is the same as 1.9 for the purpose of this discussion) -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 29 October 2007 14:46:31 UTC