- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:52:41 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
I would suggest allowing but ignoring the extra arguments. If some future version wants to support multiple arguments they can then they have the option of creating something that is compatible. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:46 PM > To: Anne van Kesteren > Cc: HTML WG > Subject: Re: HTMLDocument interface for write() and writeln() > needs an update > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > > Now they both support multiple arguments the interface > should probably > > reflect that. > > Actually I didn't really intend to allow multiple arguments, > I just had to define what happens when you get multiple > arguments because for these methods it's not the default > "wrong number of arguments" behaviour. Do we want to allow > it? That's a different question, IMHO... > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E > )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ > _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. > `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > >
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 20:53:27 UTC