W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2007

Re: HTML test suite licensing

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:52:24 -0500
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1193251944.6433.430.camel@pav>

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 14:18 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> > I followed up with W3C management/legal and they're OK with:
> > 
> >  (a) using the W3C software license for collaboration between
> >   the HTML WG and the html5lib project
> 
> This would require moving the project off of the code.google.com 
> infrastructure.  More details: http://tinyurl.com/3agnot

I read that message from Daniel Berlin, and it doesn't seem as strong as
your "require" suggests.

But OK, I'll see about using the MIT license for part (a).

> >  (b) at some milestone, publishing a snapshot of the test suite
> >   wrapped in a W3C technical report under the W3C document license.
> > 
> > James, Anne, and company, does that seems OK to you?
> > 
> > If switching from the MIT license to the W3C software license
> > is a big hassle, I'm perhaps flexible on that.
> > 
> > Chris W., does this seem OK with you? Based on your earlier
> > feedback, I'm sorta presuming it is.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:51:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:50 UTC