- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:52:24 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 14:18 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > > I followed up with W3C management/legal and they're OK with: > > > > (a) using the W3C software license for collaboration between > > the HTML WG and the html5lib project > > This would require moving the project off of the code.google.com > infrastructure. More details: http://tinyurl.com/3agnot I read that message from Daniel Berlin, and it doesn't seem as strong as your "require" suggests. But OK, I'll see about using the MIT license for part (a). > > (b) at some milestone, publishing a snapshot of the test suite > > wrapped in a W3C technical report under the W3C document license. > > > > James, Anne, and company, does that seems OK to you? > > > > If switching from the MIT license to the W3C software license > > is a big hassle, I'm perhaps flexible on that. > > > > Chris W., does this seem OK with you? Based on your earlier > > feedback, I'm sorta presuming it is. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:51:24 UTC