W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2007

HTML test suite licensing

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:58:40 -0500
To: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1193248720.6433.423.camel@pav>

The html5lib project has one of the better chunks of HTML test
materials around. I'd like to contribute to it and use it in
this Working Group, so I started looking into the licensing issues.

http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HtmlTestMaterials

html5lib uses the MIT license, which is open source and non-viral.
http://html5lib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/LICENSE

W3C has a relevant policy...

  Policies for Contribution of Test Cases to W3C
  http://www.w3.org/2004/10/27-testcases.html

... which involves using the W3C document license, which doesn't
license derivative works; i.e. it's clearly not an open source license.

Karl noted a that the DOM test suite uses the W3C software
license, which, like the MIT license, is an open source,
non-viral license.
 http://www.w3.org/DOM/Test/Documents/DOMTSFAQ

I followed up with W3C management/legal and they're OK with:

 (a) using the W3C software license for collaboration between
  the HTML WG and the html5lib project

 (b) at some milestone, publishing a snapshot of the test suite
  wrapped in a W3C technical report under the W3C document license.

James, Anne, and company, does that seems OK to you?

If switching from the MIT license to the W3C software license
is a big hassle, I'm perhaps flexible on that.

Chris W., does this seem OK with you? Based on your earlier
feedback, I'm sorta presuming it is.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 17:57:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:04 GMT