W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Detailed review of 6.2. Server-sent DOM events

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:40:14 +0200
To: "Kornel Lesinski" <kornel@geekhood.net>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tzz9dcq064w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:33:23 +0200, Kornel Lesinski <kornel@geekhood.net>  
wrote:
> How about adding XMLHttpRequest-alike interface to <event-stream>? It  
> could use readystatechange event to signal connection progress,  
> reconnections and network errors. Since it is possible to implement  
> <event-stream> using XMLHttpRequest, it might be easy for  
> implementations to expose it.

Wouldn't a simple error event be enough? (The only problem being of course  
that the server might sent such an event as well, but if you're doing that  
you're asking for confusion.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 23:40:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:04 GMT